Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Acta Med Port ; 34(3): 176-184, 2021 Mar 01.
Article in Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1134620

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Syndromic surveillance allows early detection of changes in the population's morbidity pattern. The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of indicators related to access to healthcare services, in COVID-19 surveillance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A time series analysis was performed using the weekly incidence rate of COVID-19 in Mainland Portugal, between weeks 14/2020 (March 30 to April 5) and 25/2020 (June 15 to 21), and six indicators: 1) COVID-19 consultations in primary healthcare; 2) number of COVID-19 emergency department visits; 3) number of emergency department visits due to viral pneumonia; 4) number of hospitalizations due to viral pneumonia; 5) proportion of emergency department visits due to viral pneumonia; and 6) proportion of hospitalizations for viral pneumonia. Pearson correlation and cross-correlations were computed. RESULTS: A strong correlation was found between the weekly incidence rate of COVID-19 and all indicators. [(1) 0.76; (2) 0.82; (3) 0.77; (4) 0.84; (5) 0.86; e (6) 0.90]. Emergency department visits and hospitalizations for viral pneumonia detect variations in the frequency of the disease with a one week lag compared to the incidence rate of COVID-19, in one week. COVID-19 consultations in primary healthcare and emergency department visits trail behind the incidence rate of COVID-19, in one week. The proportion of viral pneumonias in emergency department visits, or hospitalizations, is temporally aligned with the weekly incidence rate of COVID-19. DISCUSSION: The delay found in the COVID-19 primary healthcare consultations and emergency department visits, may be related to changes in access to healthcare services and clinical coding. Emergency department visits and hospitalizations for viral pneumonia may be useful in the early detection of COVID-19. Viral pneumonia may have been coded as being of unknown origin. Future monitoring of these indicators is necessary to ascertain whether the incidence of COVID-19 is significantly influenced by changes in testing strategies. The indicators described in this study will be an asset for the optimization of testing strategies, allocation of healthcare resources to the communities that are most vulnerable to severe morbidity and assessing vaccination impact. As such, surveillance systems based on clinical data will be a valuable complementary tool to SINAVE. CONCLUSION: The indicators under analysis could be used regularly, with special attention to viral pneumonias, to detect outbreaks of COVID-19. Information on pneumonia of unknown etiology may be considered in the surveillance of COVID-19.


Introdução: A vigilância sindrómica permite a identificação precoce de alterações no padrão de morbilidade da população. Este estudo tem como objetivo avaliar a utilidade de indicadores relativos a cuidados de saúde primários e hospitalares, na vigilância da COVID-19.Material e Métodos: Foi realizada uma análise de séries temporais utilizando a taxa de incidência semanal de COVID-19 em Portugal Continental, entre as semanas 14/2020 (30 março a 05 abril) e 25/2020 (15 a 21 junho), e seis indicadores: 1) consultas em cuidados de saúde primários por COVID-19; 2) número de episódios de urgência por COVID-19; 3) número de episódios de urgência por pneumonia vírica; 4) número de internamentos por pneumonia vírica; 5) proporção de episódios de urgência por pneumonia vírica face ao total de episódios de urgência por pneumonia; e 6) proporção de internamentos por pneumonia vírica face ao total de internamentos por pneumonia. Foram calculadas correlações de Pearson e correlações cruzadas.Resultados: Foi encontrada uma correlação forte entre a taxa de incidência semanal de COVID-19 e todos os indicadores [(1) 0,76; (2) 0,82; (3) 0,77; (4) 0,84; (5) 0,86; e (6) 0,90]. Os episódios de urgência e internamento por pneumonias víricas detetam variações na frequência da doença, com uma semana de antecedência. As consultas em cuidados de saúde primários e urgências por COVID-19 registam uma semana de atraso relativamente à evolução da taxa de incidência. A proporção de pneumonias víricas face ao número de pneumonias em episódios de urgência, ou internamentos, encontra-se alinhada temporalmente com a evolução da taxa de incidência semanal de COVID-19.Discussão: O atraso encontrado no padrão de evolução de consultas em CSP, e de episódios de urgência por COVID-19 face à incidência de COVID-19, poderá estar relacionado com a reorganização dos serviços de saúde e criação de códigos específicos para estas consultas. Episódios de urgência e internamentos por pneumonia vírica poderão ser úteis para a deteção precoce de possíveis surtos de COVID-19. Pneumonias víricas poderão ter sido classificadas como pneumonias de causa indeterminada. A monitorização futura destes indicadores é necessária de modo a averiguar se a incidência de COVID-19 é influenciada significativamente por alterações na estratégia de testagem. Os indicadores deste trabalho serão uma mais valia para a adequação de estratégias de testagem, alocação de recursos de saúde a comunidades mais vulneráveis à morbilidade severa e avaliação de programas de vacinação. Como tal, os sistemas de vigilância com base em registos de saúde serão um complemento valioso ao SINAVE.Conclusão: Sugere-se que os indicadores em análise sejam utilizados de forma regular, com especial atenção à informação relativa a pneumonias víricas, como forma de detetar precocemente surtos de COVID-19. A informação relativa a pneumonias de causa indeterminada poderá ser considerada na monitorização da COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Medical Records/statistics & numerical data , Sentinel Surveillance , COVID-19/epidemiology , Early Diagnosis , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Health Records, Personal , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Portugal/epidemiology , Time Factors
2.
Infez Med ; 28(3): 295-301, 2020 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-757701

ABSTRACT

Most studies evaluating chest computed tomography (CT) features in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been small-sized and have presented varied findings. We aim to systematically review these studies and to conduct a meta-analysis of their results to provide a well-powered assessment of chest CT findings in patients with COVID-19. PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched to identify published studies that evaluated chest CT findings in COVID-19 patients. Data regarding study characteristics and CT findings, including distribution of lesions, the lobe of lung involved, lesion densities, and radiological patterns, were extracted. Arcsine transformed proportions from individual studies were pooled using a random-effects model to derive pooled proportions (PPs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of fifty-four studies (n=2693 confirmed COVID-19 patients) were included in the final review. Prevalence of different CT findings varied across studies; however, the most common findings were bilateral pulmonary involvement (PP: 74.1% [68.4%, 79.5%]; I2 = 85.76%), ground glass opacification (PP: 64.6% [57.6%, 71.4%]; I2 = 91.52%), involvement of the left lower lobe (PP: 71.2% [58.9%, 82.1%]; I2 = 90.91%), and subpleural distribution of lesions (PP: 57.2% [39.0%, 74.3%]; I2 = 93.08%). Multivariate meta-regression revealed a positive association between prevalence of air bronchograms and average age of the population (p=0.013). Bilateral ground glass opacification, a subpleural distribution of lesions, and involvement of the left lower lobe were the most notable chest CT findings in COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Confidence Intervals , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Medical Records/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
3.
S Afr Med J ; 110(7): 605-606, 2020 06 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-664913

ABSTRACT

In the South African public healthcare sector, patient medical records are still written on paper and stored in filing rooms. There has been an attempt to move towards a paperless electronic system in many public healthcare facilities, but owing to lack of funding, this has been a challenge to achieve. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, the virus could be transmitted through the physical manipulation of patient records by various categories of staff who handle the records with or without gloves for protection. We discuss a digital option that has been partially used at Tygerberg Hospital (TBH), Cape Town, to avoid SARS-CoV-2 patient hard-copy record manipulation. It includes assignment of a QR code to every patient admitted as a person under investigation or confirmed COVID-19 case. The QR code is synced to one of the many free online medical notes smartphone applications (apps), which are password-protected with patient information privacy regulations (Trello is used at TBH), for daily medical notes review and editing. Upon discharge, all notes made during the patient's hospital stay, together with the discharge summary, are printed to generate a hard copy of notes for filing to avoid violation of the current national and provincial patient records policy. Doing this means that a patient will have a virtual online file through the designated app until discharge, when a physical file will be made for storage and safekeeping. It will keep physical manipulation of patient records to the minimum, and potentially assist in reducing transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus among healthcare workers.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Electronic Health Records/economics , Infection Control/methods , Occupational Health , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Costs and Cost Analysis , Developing Countries , Electronic Health Records/organization & administration , Female , Forms and Records Control , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Medical Records/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , South Africa
4.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 7(1)2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-634563

ABSTRACT

The aim of this case series is to describe and evaluate our experience of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to treat type 1 respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19. CPAP was delivered in negative pressure rooms in the newly repurposed infectious disease unit. We report a cohort of 24 patients with type 1 respiratory failure and COVID-19 admitted to the Royal Liverpool Hospital between 1 April and 30 April 2020. Overall, our results were positive; we were able to safely administer CPAP outside the walls of a critical care or high dependency unit environment and over half of patients (58%) avoided mechanical ventilation and a total of 19 out of 24 (79%) have survived and been discharged from our care.


Subject(s)
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/methods , Coronavirus Infections , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Procedures and Techniques Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Care Units , Respiratory Insufficiency , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Critical Pathways/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Records/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Oxygen Consumption , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Respiratory Care Units/methods , Respiratory Care Units/organization & administration , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/mortality , Respiratory Insufficiency/physiopathology , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Survival Analysis , United Kingdom/epidemiology
5.
Oncologist ; 25(6): e982-e985, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-38316

ABSTRACT

From a large medical center in Wuhan, the epicenter of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), we report clinical features and prognosis for three women diagnosed with COVID-19 after gynecologic oncology surgery and hospitalized in January 2020. The incidence of COVID-19 was 0.77% (3 of 389) of total hospitalizations and 1.59% (3 of 189) of patients undergoing surgeries in the ward. The infection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 may be related to the older age, comorbidities, malignant tumor, and surgery in gynecologic hospitalizations. By February 20, 2020, only two of the three patients had met the clinical discharge criteria. Given the long and uncertain incubation period of COVID-19, screening for the virus infection should be carried out for all patients, both preoperatively and postoperatively. Postponement of scheduled gynecologic surgery for patients in the epidemic area should be considered.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Genital Neoplasms, Female/surgery , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Adult , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mass Screening/standards , Medical Records/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/virology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL